Kiran debated the ethics like a judge of a small tribunal. The archive could be published and cause outrage, perhaps correction. Or it could burn reputations, derail a hundred small private concessions, and hand a convenient scapegoat to powerful people who liked quiet. Most of her instincts leaned toward transparency. But the more she read, the more she felt descriptive weight: not every hidden thing deserved daylight; some secrets were messy detritus of compromise. Still—compromise without accountability felt like the seat of rot.